ACI 4 «Доказательство будущих жизней», занятие 3
ACI 4 «Доказательство будущих жизней» · записи курса ↗
Автоматическая расшифровка записи. Возможны ошибки распознавания: имена, тибетские и санскритские слова. Расшифровки постепенно вычитываются.
Class Three July 29, 1994 Transcriber: Karen Becker (cut) What you're gonna get tonight is from the second chapter of Dharmakirti's work and he defines what (tse ma) is. So we're gonna we're gonna do that tonight. (cut) (repeat)(miluway rikpa) (repeat) (Sardu)(repeat) (miluway rikpy). That's the definition of (tse ma), pramana. Okay. This is the definition of correct perception. Valid perception. (Sardu) means "fresh", fresh, it's a fresh perception. We'll talk about it. (Miluwa) means "unerring". Not in error. Okay. And (rikpa) means "state of mind". (Rikpa) means "state of mind". (student: (unclear)) (Miluwa) means un unerring, not mistaken. That's the definition of pramana. That's the definition of (tse ma). And there are five kinds of mind...states of mind, that are not (tse ma). And you you should know them, okay. It's not on your homework, but it's good to know (laughs). There went that (unclear) (laughs) okay. These are called (tse min qyi lo). (Tse min) means "non pramanas". (student: Michael, to state that definition would be state of mind which was not made mistaken at first. ) Yeah, a fresh...you can also say a "fresh unmistaken perception". But they try to use a different word from perception to define perception... you see what I mean? So they say, a "fresh unerring state of mind". And we'll talk about that. So we're gonna give...I'm gonna give you five kinds of (tse min). (Tse min) is the opposite of (tse ma), okay. (Tse min) means (tse min) means "a non-pramana", something that's not a correct perception. You want to just go ahead? You want to just go ahead? The first one is called (lok she...lok she). (Lok) means (lok) is an interesting word...it means "ass-backwards". I can't think (laughs) (laughter) I don't know...that's the best...we don't have a good word in English. It's except for that. It means not just wrong but diametrically wrong. You know. (student: You don't mean flipped?) Like wrong but not just off the mark, but opposite, you know. (student: You mean way off or opposite a hundred and eighty degrees?) Almost opposite, yeah. Often, usually opposite. Like (mok ta) which is "wrong view" means it's not just that you're not sure about karma, you don't believe it. You specifically don't believe it. But this (lok she)...the classical example of (lok she) is when you get very sick...if you've ever been to India and if you ever studied in Dharamsala, you probably got hepatitus from the water there, and according to Tibetan medicine, when you get hepatitus you get an excess of wind in the channels, and wind has a blue color, so you see things as blue or yellow, it's interesting. When you get certain kinds of diseases you see things that are different colors. So they say if in Tibet you've got certain diseases you look at a snow mountain and it looks yellow it looks yellow or blue to you, that's a (lok she). Okay. That's not a pramana. It's not a blue mountain. (student: Seeing something that is not really the color) Snow is not blue. It's it's a mistaken perception because you're drugged up or you're drunk. Remember that we said pramana couldn't be any of those things, so you're sick or you're drugged up or you're very upset, or you have a strong emotion like jealousy and and you think you see something where there's nothing there. That's all (lok she). Okay. Those are all (lok she). (student: So (lok) is is backwards?) (Lok) means "backwards or wrong". (She) means "knowledge" or perception. (student: That makes it wrong). Very wrong, okay. I'll put I'll put one over here. (student: Number two?) Say (te-tsom) (repeat) (te-tsom) (repeat). (Te-tsom) means...it's a difficult word...the main meaning is "doubt", it's defined as a mind which is split about the object. Split into two points about the object, so and there's several kinds of (te- tsom). For example, one is (dun min gyur kyi te-tsom). That's where you say...that's where you're not sure about something and you're tending to the wrong thing, you know, if somebody says, "is the, is the world round" and you say, "well, I'm not sure, but I kind of think it's flat", that's a (dun min gyur kyi te- tsom). That's it's it's a kind of a a doubt or an uncertainty which is tending towards the wrong. The wrong view. And then (dun gyur kyi te-tsom) means a kind of doubt where you say, "well, I kind of think it's round but I'm not quite sure". And those are (te-tsoms). Those are not pramana, okay. So to have a doubt or to not be sure about something you don't you're not grasping that object clearly, directly, you're not sure about the object, so it's not a pramana. (Te-tsom) is a it's the second kind of non-pramana. (student: So then it doesn't matter if you accurately perceive it as long as you're not sure of the perception, is that the idea?) Yeah, right. So (dun gyur gyi te-tsom) means, you know, I think it was him that killed that lady, but I'm not sur...you know, if it turns out that he did, that will be a (dun gyur gyi te-tsom) but still you...because you're not clear it's not it's not correct yet. (student: Would you write those two down?) Excuse me? (student: Would you write those two down? Those two (unclear)) Long story. (student: It's it's you're not sure but yet you make a statement?) No. If you do make a statement based on a (tse min), you've done a...you're not a Buddhist...I mean, Buddhists are not...it's classic that we're not allowed to say anything unless we have a (tse ma) about it. We're not supposed to. (student: So if if you're if you're eyes are if something is bothering you, you can't see it very clearly, you don't have your glasses on, I mean that could be either one in a way right?) Yeah, what they thought about you're seeing...nor sure what it is, that (tse min). It's a non-promena. (student: But it couldn't be the other one also, it couldn't be (lok she) (unclear)) It's (lok she) if you say, if you can't see it clearly, (lok she) would be, there's a scare crow and you say it's a person because your eyes are not clear. But (te tsom) would say, "I'm not sure if it's a person or not", it's still not a pramana. These are all examples of...pramana can be direct or deductive, and I'm giving you five states of mind which are neither. These are five states of mind which are not pramana. Therefore, if you see something with these five you can't say that that thing what, what's the definition of existence? (Tse me rigpa). So if you don't perceive it with a pramana you can't be sure that it exists. (student: What if you see it but you don't know what it is?) It's a pramana towards an unknown object (laughs) (laughter) It happens. (student: (Te tsom) is the perception of your own uncertainty?)) No, that's not a, that's a pramana. (student: That is a pramana.) Yeah, I'm not sure is a (tse may) statement. (Tse ma) has all these meanings...(tse ma) pramana doesn't just mean...we're gonna get into it...it doesn't just mean that state of mind. It can mean "valid" or what's a good word, there's a word in English, "reasonable". I mean it's reasonable to say "I doubt". If your perception of your doubt is a pramana. The doubt itself is unclear towards it's object, so it's not a pramana. (student: Another question I have, when we talk about inductive pramana, we translate that as deductive valid perception, yet the idea of something being deductive in English is not something we would really (unclear) the idea of perception.) But that, yeah. (student: (unclear) we had the idea of the immediacy of a perception, what I'm wondering is does that carry over into Buddhist logic wherein the ability to prove something logically or deductively is allied with immediate perception.) Yeah, that's exactly it. The whole point is that by the time you finish this class you develop a sense, a sixth sense called deduction, and you trust it, because you understand the rules of deduction which takes a long time to study, years, you you develop a real ability to perceive objects which the people around you can't see, and you and that's a valid it's as good as your eyeballs, but you you've gotta learn first the rules of of deduction, the reasoning, and once you know them clearly, and then you see something with it, you can trust that it exists, that's a pramana. That's the whole purpose of studying this. Yeah. (student: Why are you including inductive?) I don't know the difference between inductive (laughs) and things like that. (student: Inductive is going from particular to general and deductive is general to specific.) The only thing here is, there's three different kinds, it's a long story...it would take you a couple years to study it, but basically based on a reason, you perceive that object. That's the definition of it. (student: right (unclear) logical thought process) Based on a vali on a good reason you perceive it. It's not really deduction in the in the logical sense, in the formal logic sense, yeah? (student: So in the case where you know, these in the scriptures and such they talk about the lamas perceiving the hell realms and etc etc, is this what they mean then?) No, there's a big debate about it in fact, you know. They say, is the Buddha just a great logician or did he really see...does he really see the three times. And the answer is he has what's called (nel jor mung sum) yogic direct perception, and in a deep state of meditation he sees directly those three, and that's...those lamas see directly these things. Okay. So that's the second kind of (tse min). (Tse min gyi lo) okay. (student: Of which there's two types of (te tsom), things that you're not sure of that you're going the wrong way...) One where you're tending the right way and one where you're tending the wrong way. But you don't, you know, I'm not going to ask you that, this is just interesting to know. Okay. Let's just see...does that thing come off, the one in the middle? So say, (che she) (repeat) (che she) (repeat). (Che she) is defined as (tok shin tokpay rikpa) (laughter) (laughs) and that means "the perception, the perception of something that you've already perceived." And you can call it recollection. For example, if I say look up here, okay, and then I say what did you see? You that's a (che she). Okay, that that moment later when you have a mental image of that pen, that black...the perception of the black top is a (che she). It's a (che she). Why? It's not...that perception is not triggered by the blackness itself and you don't have a clear, direct perception of that blackness anymore, and so it's a (che she). The the blackness that you're seeing a second later in your mind is very flimsy compared to, you know, blackness that created that first consciousness of blackness, and that's called (che she) and that's not it's not a (tse ma) in this school. Okay. We're in the mind only school. (student: Michael, are you talking about only immediately afterwards or is any (unclear) recollection?) Any any subsequent, yeah, any recollection of the previous perception is called (che she) and that's not a (tse ma). It's not a pramana. (student: So you say I had I had a (tse ma) but I don't have that (tse ma)) It's based on a (tse ma). It's triggered by a (tse ma). It's it's (student: So if we wha what if somebody has seen emptiness then afterwards say they don't have a (tse ma) about it anymore?) No longer a direct perception. (student: Right. So (tse ma) exists only in the immediate present?) (Sardu) (student: fresh) Fresh. Fresh perception. (student: That means all(unclear)) Yeah, in this school. The higher schools (student: (unclear)) The higher schools say, frankly, that a (che she)...it's one of the differences between the highest school and the other schools. There's a list of differences between the schools and the higher schools believe that (che she) is a (tse ma). It's a (tse ma) towards the image of black. So that's we can accept that. But but you're in the lower school right now and you have to stay in this school 'cause you'll get confused and you won't be a good Mind Only scholar if you mix up. This is Mind Only and Sautantrika you're studying. And it's very good to master other schools because they're very useful ideas that you can use when you...supposedly when you teach people everybody has a different you know, level and when you if you know all the schools you can use the appropriate tool for that person. But if you mix them all up then you get, you know, you've been to lectures that were pretty confusing (laughs) and you have to keep them separate and you have to...to know the differences between the school is very healthy for your own meditation, 'cause sometimes a thought from a lower school pops into your mind and you say, oh that that's a pretty good idea, and it's not a bad idea, the Buddha taught that idea...it's not quite correct. I know the correct one. Yeah? (student: So if you were doing the generation stage of a practice and you were visualizing a tantric deity, would it be a (che she)? In your mind (unclear) (Tumo zang tumo y lam ma jepe (unclear) de yiche) Remember that? From the... what was that thing? Is it's Maitreya Buddha (unclear) (student: one, two) (student: (unclear) And the Sakyas made the mistake of? (student: Mixing them (unclear)) Mixing them together. Mentioning one (laughs) mentioning (tumo ma imba) in a unique teaching while they were teaching (unclear) (student: This whole thing is the opposite (unclear)) It means I can't answer (laughs) it. All right. We studied that (unclear), right? (student: (unclear)) (student: Yeah) (Che she) So that's (che she). I'll give you another one now. So how many have we had, one... (students: This is four.) (Yi chu) is a...the other class came up with a good name for that...what was it, speculation, a guess. (student: (unclear) recollection?) No, recollection (laughs) (laughter) this is, you know, after I taught you guys that quotation of the Buddha and we went to work and I started to realize that all the assumptions I've made about most of the people there could well be very wrong. I guess you can call this "assumption" too. You see. Those are all (yi chus). I mean I don't really know that this guy's bad and I don't really know that this lady's dumb and I don't really know that, you know, I don't know any of those things, they I can say to me it looks that way based on what they've done so far, but you make big mistakes, and there's very famous...that you don't know who's a bodhisattva, and you can't think badly of a bodhisattva...it's much worse than thinking badly of another person who's not a bodhisattva. So, they say you have to be very very careful. We've learned that about some of the vows this weekend, on a different note. So I I think if you examine carefully you'll find that most of your perceptions about other people are really (yi chus), they're really speculation and they're they're not pramana. You really don't know what another person's (laughs) thinking, you know, so you have to say, to live in this world of wishing the best for everyone and not really letting yourself think that you know that they are bad or good is very healthy, I think, maybe that would be a nice state of mind to be in. Yeah? (student: This makes me think...) It doesn't mean that you should condone what they do wrong, 'cause that's obviously wrong. When they hurt someone...killing is wrong. Hurting is wrong. What their motivation was you can't you don't really know. Yeah. (student: Well, so if if you want to use the example you just used, for instance, you're thinking about somebody, and you really have, actually, no matter how sure you think you are about what they are thinking, you actually have uncertainty, right?) Yeah. (student: Now, if you recognize that you have uncertainty about what someone is thinking, is that a (tse ma), I mean) That's a (tse ma). We (unclear) basically. Yeah. That's a good question. To know that you're...to know that you don't (student: When you see something from a certain angle, the angle that you get, is it (unclear)) Knowing that you don't know is a is a very healthy kind of knowledge. It'll keep you out of trouble, according to the Buddha, okay. (student: Not enough of that in this world.) I'm so proud I remembered them all. (laughter). My computer broke the other night and I was like (laughter). I drew a blank on some of those...there's nothing to do about it. Say (nang la) (repeat) (ma ngepa) (repeat) (nang la) (repeat) (ma ngepa) (repeat. (Nang la) means "it appears to you but" (ma ngepa) means "you you don't ascertain it". It appears but you don't ascertain, and what it means is you think of a good English word...I don't know if there is a good English word...but it means when a a kid is absorbed by a TV show and the mother calls the child to dinner, and he doesn't respond and then the mother goes up and bams him, you know, and says (laughs) you know I called you for dinner. Didn't you hear me? And he says, you know, I was aware of something...I I heard something but I can't describe to you what you said, you know, I can't repeat to you what you said. I I admit that I was aware of something on on another level, in the background, but I I can't remember what it was you said. And that's called (nang la ma ngepa). (student: You have to have had some awareness) Yeah, it's but...you don't (ngepa). (Ngepa) means "to ascertain or to fix something" and (nang) means it appeared to your mind to your perceptions and and you had some kind of fuzzy perception of it, but you didn't really grasp that object. I don't I don't know what you want to call that. Huh? (student: You know something's you know something's happening but you don't know what it is.) You don't you don't mentally (student: That's what Bob Dylan says.) mentally (laughter) oh, okay. He must have been before his time. (student: When that happens in a dream state, is that the same thing?) I I'm not sure. (student: When you're when you're dreaming and you know somethings going on and you want to stay with it but you can't?) Generally dreams are (lok she). If if in the dream you believe the dream. If you think you're really being chased by an elephant and that's a (lok she), you know. (Nang la ma ngepa) means your your attention is diverted by something and then you you're fuzzy, you have...aren't these all kind of fuzzy perceptions, you see. I mean, aside from (lok she) which is just plain wrong, the others are all just kind of unclear perceptions. And those are not (tse ma) And that's...so I don't know what you want to call that, so what do you (laughs) (student: Being dimly aware.) Yeah, like that. (students: Distracted. Dimly aware) It's it's the it's the perception that accompanies the distraction, yeah. (student: So let's say you're standing there, walking down the street, and somebody's like doing something behind your back, and you don't see them, you don't have you don't hear them, there's no you know, the (unclear) tactile or sensory perception of them) Right. (student: Would that still fit into this category because you're missing it, you're not seeing it, it's ) Well yeah, if you if if the next moment somebody said, "did you hear the guy behind you" and you say "oh yeah, you know, I was aware of something...I I didn't really fix on it. (student: No but I'm saying...) (Nang la ma ngepa) is fixed. (student: I'm saying you don't, you don't have a clue.) No, that's not that's just a non perception. It's not a perception. So those are the five (tse mins) and if you really honestly evaluate all your perceptions during the day, I'm afraid a lot of them are fuzzy, you know, and a lot of them are (yi chu), you know, a lot of them are...you have to admit that they are assumptions and that they could very well be wrong, and to to live in your moral world that way is very healthy I think, you know. It's very good to live in a kind of state where you you're aware of your own limitations and that maybe what you're seeing is not completely true, and and I know since we had the first class that's been very helpful for me. It's it's gotten, it's made me really, allowed me to be better around other people 'cause I I can I understand I can't judge them and then a lot of times you then become more sensitive to all the mistakes you made judging people, you know. Somebody asked (unclear). Okay. So those are the five those are the five (tse mins). (student: Would you say that that last one could be that you're just vaguely aware of (unclear) Yeah, yeah. Right. And and the implication is that because you're fixed on something else. You know. The other example I think they give in scripture is a cat watching a mousehole, and you yell at the cat and the cat is you know, he's like, and he's, you know, if he could talk he'd say, "yeah, I heard you yell at me but I but I didn't quite catch what you said." (student: (unclear)) Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah (laughs) (laughter) He's aware, he just doesn't wanna (laughs) admit it. (student: Michael, isn't it also a quality that while these are happening you are unaware that they're happening and you think...) No you have...they all involve some kind of either wrong perception or some kind of fuzzy perception. (student: But but again, if you were having a fuzzy perception but you were aware that you were having a fuzzy perception...) Oh that's fine. That's a (tse ma). (student: Right) You say, I'm...if you tell your mom, "look mom, you know, I was watching TV and I didn't see you and I apologize." (student: I know you said something...yeah yeah, right.) And then you're aware that you had a a (nang la ma ngepa) and that's a (tse ma). (student: Or if you're seeing the the mountain as blue but you know it's not blue it's just because you're ill...) The sense perception is a non (tse ma) and the mental perception of the sense perception is a (tse ma). (student: Yeah) And that...after you see the state called illusion, living in the world of illusion, you know, understanding the illusion is exactly that, because after you see emptiness directly for the first time, in the highest school, and then whe...actually the way it really happens, you you know you're wrong all the time after that. So you have (tse ma) (laughs) you finally get a (tse ma) according according to highest school you've never had a (tse ma). You've never have a anything but mistaken perceptions until the time you perceive emptiness directly, you know. (student: Now what'd you say, in all these you have some perception but it's) Right. (student: the wrong perception.) They're they're they're not precise. They're not clear and they're not strong and they're not (sardu miluwa), they're not fresh and they're not unerring. Okay. So that's the fresh part is is important in this school. (Tse may kyebu) (repeat) (tse may kyebu) (repeat) Okay. (Tse ma) means, generally, "a a correct perception, a valid perception". And (kyebu) means "a person". It's it's a word for person, individual. Okay. It comes from the word (gye wa) which means what? (gye wa) (student: Virtue) Four big sufferings, ke ga na chi. (student: Birth?) Birth, yeah. So (kyebu) means anyone who's been born which means a person. That's the root of the word. (student: Yeah, but an animal is born too.) An an animal is a (kyebu). In in Buddhism person can refer to an animal. (student: All sentient beings?) Individual, yeah, a being. Yeah. So (tse may kyebu) means "a person of pramana, a pramana person. Can a person be a pramana? No, okay. There's three kinds of changing objects in the universe. Mind...mental objects, physical objects, and then there's things called like conceptual objects, and and the idea of Mike is is in the third category, the idea of Helen is, you know, it's a concept. Helen is not Helen's body. Helen is not Helen's mind. Helen is an idea that's imposed on her body and mind. You can't hurt Helen with a stick and Helen doesn't get angry, Helen's mind gets angry, so that's (tse may kyebu) isn't can't be, a person can't be (tse ma). A person can't be a mental state. That's like saying you are anger. Or you are jealousy. That's not...they're they're exclusive. (student: You mean any being?) Nobody, yeah. (student: That was just figurative a...) You have a you have anger, but you are not (unclear) (student: No in the opening statement, that was just figurative, the one who (unclear)) (Tse may gye pa) Well, well that's what I'm trying to say right now. Can there be a person who's (tse ma)? Not in the sense of a (sardu miluway rikpa), not in the sense of a mind, state of mind, but the Buddha is called (tse ma). (Tsa me kye) The person of (tse ma). So in that case (tse ma) doesn't mean a mental state. It means he's the person who has that mental state and only that mental state. Okay. So what they're trying to say is a Buddha is a perfect person. A buddha is never incorrect. A Buddha is totally correct. (Tse may kyebu) means "a person who is totally correct". (Tse may) is the state of mind which is correct, and (tse may kyebu) means the person who only has those states of mind. (student: (unclear)) And that's the whole idea, in fact, the chapter that you're studying from Dharmakirti is called (Tse ma drup de lil) which means "proving that the Buddha is (tse ma)". You know. We're trying, we're gonna attempt to prove that the Buddha is always correct. Yeah. (student: So in terms of having...in terms of becoming enlightened or developing correct perception all the time, once one involves themselves in meditation practice has a direct perception of emptiness, can they have correct perception all the time just from that or must they develop it through logical analysis constantly of the world?) You don't have it until you're a Buddha. (student: I'm saying but is is perceiving emptiness directly, will that in and of itself be enough or do you have to do all the logic also...do you see what I mean?) Well, it's one of the...is is (tong lam) is the path of seeing enough to reach Buddhahood and Nirvana? That's your question, and I ask you, is it? (Tong lam) is which of the three five paths? (student: (unclear)) It's number three. Number five is is a tricky thing, it's not really a path, it's the result, it's Buddhahood. So where the ques you're asking is there, if my answer were yes there wouldn't be a path number four. What is path number four? (student: Habituation) Habituation, where you're getting used to what you saw. So yeah you're not a (tse may kyebu) the the day after you see emptiness directly, but it helps a lot. And then that whole (gom lam), that whole fourth path called habituation is where you use your perception of emptiness and the Four Noble Truths which happened right after that to to clear out your last mental afflictions. (student: That's not (unclear) this logical process per se, that's just a recollection of your of your emptiness experience and reminding yourself.) It's both ways. You either, you both go into it directly again and then you also review what you perceived. And the implications of what you perceived on your life, you know. So for example you saw that you're gonna live seven more lives. So (laughs) you know, then you you stop being so acquisitive, you know, you don't need things so much, you know you're going to die, you know you're never going to be poor again, you're always going to live in a good circumstances and you perceive all those things, so you don't have to...you're not so concerned about it. (student: Are you saying that the seven lives would be good for sure?) Yeah. Very nice life, you know, upper one and a half...upper half percent, which is what you're in now... (student: (unclear) either a king or a prime minister?) You're in that now. No, you're in the...compared to all the Ruwandans (laughs) in the world, you know, you are in the upper (student: (unclear)) You're up in the upper...you're one in a million already, I mean, people in this room are, physically, economically you know, one in a million. (student: So we did that good in the last lifetime?) Yeah, very nice. (laughter) Excellent. (laughter) (student: What was so good?) (laughter) (unclear) burn up bad karma) What is it? Pabongka said, if you can't think of anything to rejoice about, rejoice about the fact that you were born as a human 'cause you must have done some incredible good for you to be born in the human realm. You can be proud of that. (student: Not necessarily the last lifetime always) Usually, most often, most often. (student: You know that perception that you're gonna have seven more lives (unclear) how do you know that there's a direct perception that would...) You. It's a very interesting thing that one of the side perceptions while you are...right after you come out of perceiving emptiness directly, and you see all these noble truths stuff, future lives, past lives, meet Buddhas, you know, one of the side perceptions is that you know you're not a (tse min), you know you're having a (tse ma). You know with (tse ma ) that you're having a (tse ma). And and that's just absolute, you you absolutely have that, and and it's one of the side effects of those...the incredible effect of ultimate reality, on your mind, is that for for a good period you you have all these (tse mas) and you know you're you know you're correct. It's a nice kind of experience (laughs) you know. You can also read other peoples minds for a while after that. (student: Cool) (laughter) Okay, and you know it (tse ma) while you're doing it. (student: And, but you may not be able to articulate it afterwards, right, it's not just Buddhists who (unclear) this, correct?) Excuse me? (student: Someone else who's done the right things in a previous life may have the experience of it.) Not directly. (student: No. So you have...it can only happen to a Buddhist.) And what's a Buddhist? (student: Aha) (student: Somebody who knows about the the Three Noble Tru... the three ratnas and takes refuge in them.) Yeah. (student: Has the three ratnas.) Yeah. I mean are they worshipping a picture of that being, maybe not. (student: But they may be seeing one of the three But the essence of the (student: noble ratnas) The essence of the Three Jewels has nothing to do with the picture of Buddha. Nothing to do with it. (student: Right. So, someone can be worshipping a picture of Mohammed, and actually still be addressing one of the three ratnas) Could be a Buddh, could be a Buddhist. And an abbot of a monastery could be a non-Buddhist. Yeah. (student: I was just, when you were describing this Buddha becoming a separate, tota... perfect correct...) Yeah, totally correct (student: Almost, I mean it sounds, I don't know, it sounds like like when we say conscious...it's almost a (tse ma) you know, that the word "consciousness" implies correct (unclear), correct perception, so in a way it almost sounds like Buddha is consciousness, I mean that's ) Yeah, that's very very it's very relevent, yeah, he's all knowing. We're gonna study that. We're gonna get into that. But it but the idea here is if if we can prove that the Buddha is (tse ma), if we can prove that the Buddha is (miluwa), that he cannot make a booboo, that he (laughter) cannot lie, you know, if you can prove that he cannot lie, eh I or even better, if you can prove that he never speaks unless he knows perfectly that thing and he's seen that it's true, then what's the implication? You know, if you can establish that about any given person, you know, Ariel, if we could figure out that anything that Ariel says is absolutely true. She will not open her mouth unless what she comes out of it is absolutely, totally true from her personal (tse ma) (student: And she says a lot of things.) No, and then she comes up and says all these great things about being moral and reaching the end of your suffering and then you're, it's great, but the but first you have to establish that she can't make a mistake and that she will never say something unless she personally perceived it to be absolutely correct, you know, then then that's very interesting, if you could meet a person like that. (student: Or if you ask a person like that, "are you Buddha?", he'd have to say yes? (laughter)) We're we're gonna talk about it (laughs) (laughter) (student: Good one.) We're gonna talk about it. (student: When?) We're gonna talk about it two classes from now. (student: How do you not know that there...how do you not know that there saying something for a certain kind of reason?) For what? (student: For a certain kind of reason...for a certain kind of result. I mean maybe) We'll talk about it. There are rules, to answer your question, and that come in the fifth class, you're only in the third class. Okay. So that's the idea of a (tse may kyebu). (unclear) Now I'm gonna do, let's see, I need this picture. (student: Are there degrees of (tse ma) or is it just (unclear) They're not a (tse ma kyebu), I mean, they the words (tse may kyebu) is applied to them sometimes in scripture, but but literally the person who only has (tse ma) is the Buddha. But it's said that a Buddhist master knows enough not to ever say anything that he knows something he hasn't had a (tse ma) about. That that there...you reach a stage before you become a Buddha that you will never say something if you haven't had a (tse ma) about. It's an advertisement. (laughs) (laughter) (student: Commercial break) (laughter) I never asked anybody for anything in my life...in my dharma life, and I've never been asked for anything in my Dharma life. No teacher of mine has ever asked me for a dollar and I like it that way and I think that's the way it should be. No I've been studying twenty years in the monastery and no one's ever asked me for anything. A lot of teachers giv have given me back things that I gave them, and I think that's the way it should be. Now, there's a certain custom in the monastery when you reach a Geshe degree which I will finish next year, it's like eighteen years study, and then you, you have to go out and beg people for something and I think it's supposed to be something for (unclear) I think it's supposed to be something for humility maybe, I don't know, the word monk in Buddhism (bhiksu) means "beggar", we're supposed to humble ourselves at the doors of people in the morning and ask for our our meal, and if they decide not to give it, we don't eat (laughs), we're not allowed to keep food, actually, so I think it has something to do that. Anyway, the gift that I I...when you become a Geshe then you you have to throw a big ceremony and you have to give a gift to the monastery. So my gift is going to be a new debate park. This is a debating park. And there's some pictures up there of our of our park now, I I don't know if you can see it very clearly but (student: Is that one that (unclear)) Yeah. There's a park now that...we don't even have a proper park. The park is supposed to be a big open park with sto flat stones and in Tibet it had trees and it was really beautiful, and it had a big wall, and you go into there at eight o'clock and you don't come out until one a.m. or something and that whole time you are intensely studying, and it that's really the engine that drives Buddhism in Tibet, you know, it's the teaching is one thing, but it's when the students get together for five hours straight and beat it out of each other...you can not take a book, you must have everything memorized, and you can run out of memorization in about three minutes (laughter) (laughs) and you go on for four or five hours, and it's great, it's a great system, it it's keeping Buddhism alive in my idea it's what's really keeping this knowledge flying in the monasteries, is the debate system, so I wanted to give a debating park, and we have a piece of land that we got...it's about two hundred and fifty feet square, and in Tibet there wouldn't have been this four roofs, there was no such thing in Tibet, they would spread gravel on the stones and when it got cold you just put the gravel on your lap (laughter) and you you get under the gravel like up to your waist (laughter) and that's how they kept warm, and when you reach your about your fourteenth year you're allowed to wear a cloak (laughs) (laughter) tha you before that you're supposed to tough it out, you know, and it's really cold, and and we do it outside, it's in the stars, we didn't have electricity for years and we would sometimes you couldn't see the guy you were debating, it's kind of fun (laughter) but we reached the point where we have now eight hundred and, seven hundred and seventy five monks, and our we don't have a place to debate...it's not a good one, we we're debating in the porch of our temple and when it rains everyone gets wet, you just get soaked, you have to sit there on the ground and you just get wet, and if the debate master is feeling good he lets you go home (laughter) and if he's not around (laughs) you sit there, you can leave, you know, so so we designed it that there'll be a four roofs around the corner and when the monks when it starts to rain you can move under the roof and all the Geshe candidates they take their exams here and, you know, big debate contests between the school, between different classes and stuff like that, so that's my I I I pledged to to to grub money for that. (unclear), give me one of those boxes. So the idea is I came up with this idea that I I wouldn't ask anybody...it's going to cost seventy thousand dollars, (student: Does not include cost overruns?) Yeah, and I have a budget you can see. But we came up with this idea that I'm going to ask people that I know to keep this box in their house and when you come home you put your spare change in it. And you (student: (unclear) for?) (student: Michael, if you want a better (unclear) idea to change, it it attracks too much attention to the) Well we'll talk about it. Anyway, you put your change in there ever and if you agree to sign up for this you get a new box in the mail every (laughter)once a month (laughter) you get a new box in the mail and you then the old box has stamps on it already and it has this tape here and you just seal it and you dump it in the mail box and it has padding inside, after it's full you can't, we, she's been working on it, Marie, and we took it to the post office and showed it to them (laughter) it's pretty cool. (student: But I mean, Michael, wouldn't the postage equal to the amount of change inside?) (student: Yes) No the postage is... she put a little...the postage is a buck sixty-nine, and (student: (unclear)) Well, the goal is that you put a little more in than your change (laughs) (laughter), the goal is that you try to give two dollars a day, okay, the goal is that you try...you know you're gonna have seventy five or a dollar in change and then you throw in another (laughter) dollar bill (laughter) (laughs) and the idea is to try to hit two dollars a day and if I can get a hundred people to do that (student: Michael, we should just bring it in when we come to class, and we would save postage (unclear) No we will cut off the postage and re-use it if you bring it in, but the idea is that you don't have any excuse. All you have to do is lick it and throw it in a mail box. And and that's it and Maria, there's a whole team of people, Serge Laiten is in charge of it, and Maria's helping, and that's all, it will go on for a year, it will go on for twenve months. If if people give about two dollars we'll finish and they've already started planting the mango trees (student: Aw, that's sweet.) The trees come up and then they link and it's good for bald marks (laughter) and it's and it smells sweet...mango trees are very they're very sweet (student: (unclear)) (student: (unclear) for the hungry, though?) (laughs) And that's the pitch. And I think...there's a couple of other reasons. Serge needs to do this because he's he's planning something special and I think as a center, as a group, if we build that the karma of that will mean that these classes will go for a long time, very beautiful results, good results for the people in these classes. I believe that karmically that would happen. So I believe that would be the the result we would have. And then I owe the monastery a lot...we wouldn't have any of this, if there wasn't debating there I wouldn't know anything and we'll put a plaque there with everybody's name on it (laughter), there's gonna be no it's like a brass thing and they have they make it there and so that so I ask you to do that if you can, and it's no, you know me by now, it's everything here is free and no obligation, if you can do it I'd appreciate it and if not I it's all right, and you give your name to (unclear). Right, and your address, and she'll give you a box for tonight and then start today if you can tomorrow. (student: Would you what is the deadline?) You when you get the new box you dump the old one (student: No no no, when is your deadline) I'd like to finish within a year. But they're gonna start building now, I mean, the first month I'll send (student: Oh, so as you get money you send it in) Yeah, and they're very good at...the monks, normally, Tibetans monks love to build stuff and pay for it later (laughter) (laughs) It's gotten many monasteries in trouble. Yeah. (student: Is this for both colleges? Is it ) Well, there's a trick at Sera. First of all I'm from Sara Mey so it would be I I have to build it for my monastery. They have to...we don't debate together. We have we have our separate debate grounds. Now Sera Je, the other our sister college who we compete with, heard that I was doing this (laughter) (laughs) and they've already selected a piece of land and they've already started planting their trees, so what you do is you play off (laughter) this when when when we built the water the first water system there, we used to drink out of mud, literally mud, and they had no water and we went to Sera...there's a Sera Government Council, half Sera Je and half Sera Mey, and I said, you know, I'd like to raise money for water system, to drill water, and they said, "just do it for Sera Mey and then (laughs) Sera Je will go out and get the money they need on their own". They have a lot of lam...we only have one big Lama in the West, that's Geshe Tharchin, Sera Je has Lama Zopa, Geshe Sopa, Lama Yeshe, Geshe Rabten, and a and a lot of other in Australia they have about seven or eight, so they're they're they're very healthy and we're like the black sheep, we don't (laughter) (laughs) we're always broke and our monks are skinny and (laughter) you know, really, and we don't have enough, so that's they're doing okay (unclear), they're doing Lama Yeshe's centers are very generous. They just presented them with half a million dollars for their food (student: (whistles)) So, you know, we don't have that. (student: So we're gonna get the karma for really initiating (unclear) debate grounds for the first ones) Yeah yeah yeah (laughter) they've already in fact what happened was the the ground that I chose which is up there...it's behind the Dalai Lama's residence at the monastery, is closer to Sera Je, so they said, will you trade sites with us. They had one that was very convenient for us (laughter), so it actually it's a good luck...it's a good auspicious beginning 'cause for the first time I think we cooperated (laughter) and we traded si sites, so we can see the land up there, and that's gonna be Sera Je's up there, but so I appreciate if you do it, and that's all. (student: Whose idea was it that this monthly box thing) I've seen them in a...when you, whenever you do your tantric retreats you'll find that you meditate a lot everything except (laughter) (laughs) what you're supposed to (laughter) (laughs) you know. (student: So this came to you during a retreat?) Yeah, yeah. (laughter) (student: Michael, is there going to be an accounting of ) Yeah, you can also by the way you can get a non you'll get a tax we'll we'll count it there you don't have to worry about it, we'll count it when it hits New Jersey, it's pre it's pre- addressed, you don't have to do anything, you just dump it. (student: But you can bring it here too.) Or you can bring it here, and then we will give you receipts if you want us to, and we'll keep a track and then that's tax exempt, we are IRS approved and all that stuff. (student: You know what would really be good to do would be to chart it on the wall so people can see if (unclear) behind that. We're going do. That's, she (unclear) right? (unclear) She ran away. She's making the chart already, and we have a hundred dollars, somebody (student: All right, Nina) threw in the first hundred. (clapping) (student, Nina: (unclear) it's not my money, somebody give it to me) (student: Well, don't steal it) You heard about that robbery on (laughs) 28th street (laughter).(unclear) do you have the chart yet? Stilwell says it'd be a good idea to have a chart. (student: Not one of those thermometers, is it?) (student: No it's it's (laughter) Just think United Way (laughter) (student: Actual versus needed, you know) (student: Hey that's an idea (unclear), all right, cool) So that's all. Have some refreshments and we'll start in about five minutes. (student: That's great. When did you actually budget this) Well, I committed to find a sponsor and then I realized it would be nice to (unclear)-lots of students talking together in background). (student: Michael you should have some boxes with no stamps, this way you don't have to (unclear) (student: If I get stuck can I borrow your battery? (laughter) (student: Yeah yeah, well I hope (unclear) (student: But then you waste the boxes) (student: Well I'll let you record and I'll just have to record (unclear) (student: And that's boxes, you have to think about costs) (student: See with these rechargable batteries they die fast, like once you get down to three, they're good, and then they run on three for a while but then like once they go from a three like in two minutes they're gone. (student: Yeah, you know I recharged it once and I left it in my bag and I thought they were good and I came in here and they weren't and I don't know how long I had them in my bag. I had them recharged in five minutes and then they went unn.n.n.n.n.) (student: yeah, died.) (cut) (dang) (repeat) (tamche kyenpa) (repeat) (dang) (repeat) (der drupay lam) (repeat) One more time. (Tarpa dang) (repeat) (tamche kyenpa dang) (repeat) (der drupay lam) (repeat). Okay. You know what (tarpa) is? There's a (tarpa) publications in in London, they call (Tharpa) bad spelling (laughter), freedom. Freedom. Liberation. Moksha. In Sanscrit. And it refers to Nirvana. Which the definition is (unclear Diamond) (laughs) (student: A cessation) Yeah (student: which comes from the individual analysis and (unclear) Wow. (students: All right. (laughter and clapping) I called her this morning and told her (laughter). (student: (Unclear)) No that's great. Okay. They say you say the end of your mental afflictions, the end of all your anger, jealousy (student: Permanently) Permanently cessation...because you saw emptiness. That's (tarpa). That's (tarpa). Could you achieve it this evening? (student: Yes) Would you look different tomorrow (laughter) morning? (students: No) No (laughter). You'd stop scowling maybe when you get up (laughs) and (tamche kyenpa), (tamche) means "all, everything". By the way (dang) means "and". (dang) means "and" (student: a n d?) A n d. (tamche) means "everything". (Kyenpa) means "to know". So (tamche kyenpa) is the mind of a Buddha, omniscience, all knowingness. So, nirvana and the state of omniscience, Buddhahood, all knowingness. And (dang) and (der) means "to them", (der) means "to those two", to them, (drupay) means "going, for going, for traveling" and (lam) means the what? (students: Path) Path. Path. So if you have to read that part in Tibetan normally you start from the back, so what is it? The (lam) (students: The path) For (dru pa) (student: The path for traveling) For going to those (student: To those two things) So there's three things being mentioned here; one is nirvana, one is omniscience of Buddhahood and one is the path to get there. And the purpose of the whole second chapter of Dharmakirti's book, which is what you're studying if anybody ever asks you, is to try to prove that these three even exist. (student: What would the full statement be?) Nirvana, Buddhahood and the path for traveling to them. (student: It's a it's a clause, it's not a sentence) Yeah. There's no sentence. Yeah. Nirvana, omniscience and the path to get to them. Those are the three things that we want to try to establish ea...and and Kedrup Je we if you came to the Friday night class Tsongkapa's you know, one of his two great disciples, he said, frankly speaking, you and I aren't...we don't even have a (tse ma) if there is such a thing as a Buddha. You know. We are Buddhists and we are studying Buddhism to achieve Buddhahood and we cannot...Kedrup Je says you can't give me three (laughs) good arguments why Buddhism exis...Buddhists...the state of a Buddha, enlightenment, even exists. You know, you're not sure. It's a (te tsom). You have a (tse min). You you're not really sure, you know, and you're not really sure that nirvana exists or that it's possible, much less how to get to there, you know,so so really if you're a good Buddhist logician, the first thing you have to admit is that maybe (laughs) there's no such thing, you know, you're not sure that they even exist, and the and the function of this whole chapter and really the reason future lives and past lives come up is is in conjunction with try trying to prove these three, that they even are possible and that they even exist. And that's the big job of pramana. That's why we're spending so much time on (tse ma). We want to try to get a (tse ma) about these three. Then then if you if you really had a (tse ma) that these things were possible, that they existed, then you could make some good progress, you know, if you if you had some pretty convincing evidence that such a thing as nirvana was possible, then your life would change a lot, your behavior would change a lot, you know, yeah. (student: I didn't understand the connection (unclear) I didn't...there was no connection made yet. I just threw it out as a as a morsel, you know, you're gonna get that later...it's a good question, you know, what connection is there between this class which is supposed to be about past and future lives, by the way that...the proof of past and future lives is found in this chapter, but it's not why he wrote the chapter...it's a side issue. But for westerners it's pretty, you know, we want to know about it, so that's what I named the course 'cause it's cute, but it's really just a side issue and it doesn't even come until the seventh class I believe. What we're trying to prove is that these three things are even possible, and that's that's gonna be the main thing. Now what kind of (tse ma)s are there? How many kinds of (tse mas)? Basically two. Basically two. What are they? (student: Direct (unclear)) Direct and? (students: Deductive reasoning) You can call it deductive or reasoning is maybe better, okay. The first is defined as not depending on a reason. The second is dep is defined as depending on a reason. Based on a good reason you see something, you perceive something. Okay, That's de what we're calling deductive reasoning. And there's two (student: (unclear)) By the way are these things...what level of reality are these three things on? (student: The first is direct and obvious. (unclear) (laughs)) I'd say you know some of it's hidden and some of it's deeply hidden. Okay. So what kind of...of which which one of those two (tse mas) are you gonna have to rely upon? (students: Deductive) Deductive. There's two types of deductive...did we do that? (student: No) Yeah, there are three. Did we do three? (student: No we we never talked about it (unclear)) Oh, okay, all right. Well we'll I'll mention it briefly and then we'll stop. Three kinds of deductive perception. The one you use for deep objects is is what you normally think of as reasoning...you can say reasoning. Log...you can say logical reasoning, maybe that's correct. The second one depends on belief in an authority. (student: Believe or belief?) Belief in an authority. Do you do you...in other words you're going to examine the person who's saying it and if you can come up with some compelling reason that he can't lie or that he won't say anything that's not true, and then he says something very deep, you you you can't perceive the the truth of it. Those are for deeply hidden things. (student: I don't follow the structure here) In other words if you want to perceive a hidden thing...watch this pen, (laughs) okay...did it hit the floor? (student: Deductive reasoning.) That's deduction. You did not see the pen hit the floor, you're that's (kok gyur) for you, that's hidden. It's not deeply hidden because you don't need my authority you don't have to believe that I'm a person who never lies, and I say, the pen hit the floor...you don't need that. It's it's not that deep (laughs) you know. (laughter) All right. If it were that deep you'd need me to say, look, did I ever lie to you (laughs) (laughter) and I I'm telling you, the pen hit the floor. You know, and I can't lie, you know, I never lie and and and you find some compelling reasons to why I can't lie and then I tell you the pen hit the floor, then that would be deep... if it were deeply hidden, something that you could never see on your own even with thinking, but it's just someone has to present it to you and then based on your deductive reasoning that he can't lie, you you take it. Yeah. (student: I I I guess when you described it last time, last session, I thought you were saying, you know, about some (unclear) you know, we don't understand that, but if you know we trust the authority and then we read it then we see it, that, I mean is that) Oh eventually it it all The Proof of Future Lives Class 3, part 3 Transcriber: Karen Becker (student: I mean, is that also hidden, is that also very hidden? I mean is that also on that level? Does it have to be proven?) Oh, that's a good question...no. It doesn't have to be. (student: So so that's the first part of what you're saying. Logical reasoning is used for hidden things and the second part of what you're saying, how does that relate?) It's the second part I'm saying that we for very hidden things, deeply hidden things, you need authority, a person of authority, a (tsemay kyebu), you know, that person that can (student: (unclear)) Yeah, you could never figure it out on your own. You need someone to come and say, that's the way it is, and then you need some deductive reasoning to prove why he can't lie. Why he would never lie. (student: For following his reasoning about it? I mean if he) No, then it would be deductive. You see. (student: Oh I see) The Buddha can teach you logic and you can perceive emptiness in this class, intellectually. That's a deductive perception at that time. (student: So it doesn't have to do with the (unclear)) No not no. And then there's a third one which is not too important and it's not mentioned very much if you want to be complete about it...there's a kind of perception that about conventions. What is conventions mean? It means we all agree to call the moon a ball of cheese or something, okay. And you normally a convention has to have a a a sort of a good reason behind it, you know, it looks like it's got holes in it like a piece of cheese. That's called convention by similarity. And then we all agree to call it...or the man in the moon. Okay. We say there's a man there. It means there's a drawing of a man. So that means just between all of us we all agree to call something something. And that's and you can perceive that that thing can reasonably be called that. That's called it...that's the third kind of deductive perception. (student: (unclear)) (student: Similar) In other words if I say okay Marie decided tonight...we were searching for a name for these boxes and she decided...we kind of decided to call it a "Dharma Box". Okay. So it's a Dharma Box. Now now next time I come into the class and I say, did anyone send in their Dharma Box (laughs) you know, you all know what I'm talking about. You know. Why? Because you can say, well, I remember last week we agreed to call this thing a Dharma Box. And there's no better reason than that. (cut) So the the convention can be anything that you can imagine. That's the limitation of convention. And well it's not very important (laughs) okay. The point is, to perceive these three things you're gonna need either reasoning, logic, or you're gonna need authority and to get authority you've gotta prove that that person is is totally correct person. (student: Which is based upon logic and reasoning?) I'm gonna...yeah, yeah. And I'm gonna go into that. That's a big subject. (student: So Michael, we had for deep objects, for very deep objects and for conventionally agreed upon objects?) Excuse me? (student: What we) Oh. The first kind of deductive reasoning, logical reasoning, is used for objects which are hidden. The second kind of deductive reasoning which is based on authority is used for objects which are deeply hidden. The examples are emptiness and the very subtle workings of karma, okay. Emptiness is easy enough for you to figure out with logic, you can perceive emptiness directly based on logic. You can never see the deep workings of karma based on logic. You have to have a an omniscient being come to you and say, look, you know, the reason your ear is shaped like that is that a million years ago you hit somebody, you know, you just could never see it on your own with logic. The third one is got nothing to do with deep or not deep. It's just things that we agree to call something. So you don't have worry...don't worry about the third one. Don't sweat on that one. It's the first two that you're gonna need to perceive these things, and you're very much want to. You know, if I could convince you that there is such a thing as nirvana, really, if I could really get you to a state where you could see with a (tse ma) that nirvana exists, your life would change. You know, you you come to this class because of what we call a (bak chak), karmic seed from your past life. You enjoy it or you're attracted to it...you en you kind of like it, but but you probably if you are who you seem to be which I don't know, you you probably don't have a (tse ma) about nirvana. And what really what it is, and if you came out of this class with a (tse ma) about what is nirvana and what is Buddhahood, your life would change. You know. Then your goal would be very clear to you because you would see that it's possible to reach this state where you don't have to die. And you don't have to get old and you don't have to have suffering anymore, you know, that would be...and if if you really believed that such a thing was possible your life would totally change, you know, and that that's the whole purpose of this class. We're trying to get a (tse ma) about that about that thing, and we're gonna try, we we really will try and I think at least you'll come out with a pretty strong tendency that this thing does exist and I can reach it, you know, so that's exciting. Okay. I have one more installment of the sutra...I don't wanna read it tonight but maybe next time I'll have someone get up and read it. It's a very interesting sutra. The other class is translating it. And I appreciate if you can comment on the translation. (student: (unclear)) I made more, yeah, I will. And Anila's...you you did the word processing? She worked this up on her on her (unclear), Sarah did the translation. (unclear) This is a this sutra has very big meaning and by the end of the class when you get to the last line of the sutra you'll know why. I think that's all (unclear) (students: Homework? ) Oh the homework. (laughter) (student: Is this a real picture?) (student: It is nirvana) (student: Is this a picture (laughter) yeah, I know, but I mean is this a real, is it a real) It's a color shot. (student: Ah, that's neat) And then you get a new picture every month. (students: Wow. Different. Ahhhh.) Yeah (student: (unclear)) (student: Do you have any more of the translations (unclear) Excuse me? I don't have more but maybe Anila can run some more off next week. Can you run some more off, later? (students; (unclear)) How many how many more people wanna wanna translation. (student: me) Maybe like four or five more. (student: I'll pass them on down (unclear)) I didn't ask you to type in the other class (laughter) (students: (all talking together at once) Kiley, you ready? (student: Unclear)) (prayer: short mandala) (prayer: dedication) 940801-1.aaa 15a.txt Course IV: The Proof of Future Lives